पुलिस की खबरें, सिर्फ पुलिस के लिए ...... An International Police Blog for police personnels and their family, their works, their succes, promotion and transfer, work related issues, their emotions,their social and family activities, their issues and all which related to our police personnels.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Punjab Police : Police & Cricket: पंजाब पुलिस का क्रिकेट बोर्ड पर 11 करोड़ रुपए बकाया!
पंजाब क्रिकेट एसोसिएशन (पीसीए) पर पंजाब पुलिस ने 11 करोड़ रुपए से भी अधिक राशि बकाया होने का आरोप लगाया है। मोहाली स्थित पंजाब क्रिकेट संघ मैदान पर हाल ही में आईसीसी वर्ल्डकप-2011 के अंतर्गत भारत और पाकिस्तान के बीच सेमीफाइनल मुकाबला खेला गया था।
इसके अलावा अब यहां इंडियन प्रीमियर लीग (आईपीएल) के चौथे संस्करण के भी मुकाबले खेले जा रहे हैं जबकि कई रोमांचकारी टेस्ट मैच यहां खेले जा चुके हैं। पंजाब पुलिस ने क्रिकेट मैचों के दौरान यहां सुरक्षा के पुख्ता इंतजाम किए थे। पुलिस का कहना है कि पीसीए पर पुलिसकर्मियों का 11 करोड़ रुपए का बिल बकाया है।
चंडीगढ़ से 10 किलोमीटर की दूरी पर स्थित इस स्टेडियम में अंतरराष्ट्रीय मैचों के आयोजन से पीसीए को काफी अधिक लाभ हुआ है। पुलिस का कहना है कि मैच के दौरान ड्यूटी पर तैनात पुलिसकर्मियों का अब तक भुगतान नही हो सका है।
मोहाली के वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक गुरप्रीत सिंह भुल्लर ने बताया कि हमने पीसीए अधिकारियों को पुलिसकर्मियों के लम्बित बिल मामले में कई पत्र भेजे हैं लेकिन इसका कोई फायदा नही हुआ है। मुझे लगता है कि यह मामला पुलिस के हाथों से परे है और अब यह सरकार के स्तर का है।
पुलिस अधिकारियों के अनुसार, बीते पांच साल में इस मैदान पर आयोजित हुए मैचों के कुल 33 बकाया बिल पीसीए के पास भेजे गए हैं जिनकी राशि 11 करोड़ से अधिक है लेकिन पीसीए ने अभी तक इसके बदले में एक सिक्का भी नहीं दिया है।
भुल्लर ने कहा कि हाल ही में यहां वर्ल्डकप के तीन मैच हुए थे। इस दौरान पुलिसकर्मियों के एक करोड़ रुपए का बिल बकाया है और हमने इस बिल को पीसीए को भेजा है। अधिकारियों के अनुसार, वर्ल्डकप के तीन मैचों में पुलिसकर्मियों का बकाया 10,857,347 करोड़ रुपए है जिसमें भारत और पाकिस्तान के बीच खेले गए सेमीफाइनल मुकाबले के 44,88,247 लाख रुपए भी शामिल है।
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
WB Police : Constable commits suicide in police station
KOLKATA: A 37-year-old police constable on sentry duty at Baranagar police station shot himself with his .303 rifle a half past midnight on Sunday. Colleagues are shocked by the death, more so because Debojyoti Mukhopadhyay did not have any apparent reason for suicide.
Police officers, who investigated the scene, say he positioned the rifle barrel under his chin and pulled the trigger with his toe. At 3.7 feet, the .303 is a long rifle and is cumbersome to manoeuvre — not an easy way to shoot oneself, whether by accident or design. The bullet exited and blew a hole in the fibreglass sentry shed. Police are not sure what drove him to kill himself. They are hoping Debojyoti's family can shed some light on why the policeman was so depressed.
Police officers, who investigated the scene, say he positioned the rifle barrel under his chin and pulled the trigger with his toe. At 3.7 feet, the .303 is a long rifle and is cumbersome to manoeuvre — not an easy way to shoot oneself, whether by accident or design. The bullet exited and blew a hole in the fibreglass sentry shed. Police are not sure what drove him to kill himself. They are hoping Debojyoti's family can shed some light on why the policeman was so depressed.
Monday, April 11, 2011
Ultra-modern building of state’s first cyber crime, forensic lab inaugurated in Mohali
Punjab Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Badal inaugurated the state-of-the-art ultra-modern building of the state’s first Cyber Crime-cum-Forensic Science Laboratory building in Mohali’s Phase IV on Sunday.
Equipped with the latest gadgets, the six-storied building with two storied basement — constructed by the Punjab Police Housing Corporation at a cost of Rs 12.5 crore — has been completed in a record time of two years. However, it was awaiting inauguration for the over two months for want of appointment from Sukhbir.
Speaking to mediapersons, Sukhbir said the state crime police station and cyber crime police station will act as referral centers for sensitive criminal and cyber crime cases for the entire state. The Cyber Crime Laboratory has been equipped with the latest gadgets and utilities to act as a nodal centre for cyber crime cases. Similarly, the Forensic Science Laboratory has been equipped with latest and modern scientific equipment required to examine exhibits received from police stations across the state, he added.
Paris police arrest veiled women after ban
An Agence France-Presse journalist at the scene said the arrests came after police moved in to break up the protest which had not been authorised.
"Today was not about arresting people because of wearing the veil. It was for not having respected the requirement to declare a demonstration," said police spokesman Alexis Marsan.
Two women in niqabs, a woman wearing an Islamic headscarf that does not cover the face and a demonstration organiser were arrested, Marsan said.
In another protest, Rachid Nekkaz from the Don't Touch My Constitution activist group and "a female friend wearing the niqab" were arrested by police in front of President Nicolas Sarkozy's Elysee Palace, he said.
"We wanted to be fined for wearing the niqab, but the police didn't want to issue a fine," Nekkaz said by telephone.
On Saturday police arrested 59 people, including 19 veiled women, who turned up for a banned protest in Paris against the new law, the first of its kind to be enforced in Europe.
"Today was not about arresting people because of wearing the veil. It was for not having respected the requirement to declare a demonstration," said police spokesman Alexis Marsan.
Two women in niqabs, a woman wearing an Islamic headscarf that does not cover the face and a demonstration organiser were arrested, Marsan said.
In another protest, Rachid Nekkaz from the Don't Touch My Constitution activist group and "a female friend wearing the niqab" were arrested by police in front of President Nicolas Sarkozy's Elysee Palace, he said.
"We wanted to be fined for wearing the niqab, but the police didn't want to issue a fine," Nekkaz said by telephone.
On Saturday police arrested 59 people, including 19 veiled women, who turned up for a banned protest in Paris against the new law, the first of its kind to be enforced in Europe.
French burka ban: police arrest two veiled women
The women were arrested along with several other people protesting in front of Notre Dame cathedral in Paris against the new law.
Jourrnalists at the scene said the arrests came after police moved in to break up the protest which had not been authorised.
On Saturday police arrested 59 people, including 19 veiled women, who turned up for a banned protest in Paris against the draconian new law, the first of its kind to be enforced in Europe.
Earlier, French police said they will be enforcing the country’s new burka ban "extremely cautiously" because of fears of provoking violence.
They fear Muslims extremists will use the law to provoke fights with officers, while rich visitors from countries like Saudi Arabia will also cause trouble .
All garments which cover the face were officially banned from first thing this morning, with offenders facing fines of 150 euros (£133).
But police admitted that they feared being accused of discrimination against Muslims, whether approaching women in tinderbox housing projects or on the Champs Elysee.
"The law will be very difficult to apply on certain estates," said Patrice Ribeiro, of the Synergie police union.
Referring to two Paris suburbs where riots regularly break out because of alleged discrimination against Muslims, Mr Ribeiro said: "I can’t see police going to book dozens of veiled women doing their shopping in Venissieux or in Trappes.
"It will be the same when a police officer is about to arrest a veiled Saudi who is about to go into Louis Vuitton on the Champs Elysees. In all cases, the forces of order will have to be measured and cautious in their behaviour."
Synergie has already instructed its members to view the ban as a "low priority", and Mr Ribeiro said there would "inevitably be incidents".
Mohamed Douhane, another Paris police officer and Synergie member, said he and his colleagues also "expected provocation by a minority."
Mr Douhane added: "Fundamentalist movements are eager to raise the stakes. The police know they will be held responsible for any public order disturbances."
Police have already been warned not to arrest women "in or around" mosques, and "citizen’s de-veilings" are also banned.
The strict instructions, from Interior Minister Claude Guent, are contained in a nine page circular issued to officers.
With tensions running high within the country’s six million strong Muslim community, officers have been told to look out for members of the public taking the law into their own hands.
Instead they will have to call the police, who will in turn have four hours to consider whether an offender should be fined.
This will apply to all garments which cover the eyes, although scarfs, hats, and sunglasses are excluded.
As well as a mosque, Muslims will also be able to put on a veil in the privacy of their own homes, a hotel room, or even a car, as long as they are not driving.
Police have already complained that they will have to waste time on "burka-chasing", with Denis Jacob, of the Alliance police union, adding: "We have more important matters to be dealing with."
The ban means France is officially the second country in Europe, after Belgium, to introduce a full ban on a garment which immigration minister Eric Besson has called a "walking coffin".
While French women face the fines and ‘civic duty’ guidance if they break the law, men who force their wives or daughters to wear burkas will face up to a year in prison, and fines of up to 25,000 pounds.
Posters have already gone up in town halls across France reading: "The Republic lives with its face uncovered."
Belgium introduced a full ban last year, although it has not been enforced with any vigour. A ban also looks likely in Holland, Spain and Switzerland.
There are no plans to introduce a similar ban in Britain, although politicians from the UK Independence Party and some Tory backbenchers have suggested one.
Jourrnalists at the scene said the arrests came after police moved in to break up the protest which had not been authorised.
On Saturday police arrested 59 people, including 19 veiled women, who turned up for a banned protest in Paris against the draconian new law, the first of its kind to be enforced in Europe.
Earlier, French police said they will be enforcing the country’s new burka ban "extremely cautiously" because of fears of provoking violence.
They fear Muslims extremists will use the law to provoke fights with officers, while rich visitors from countries like Saudi Arabia will also cause trouble .
All garments which cover the face were officially banned from first thing this morning, with offenders facing fines of 150 euros (£133).
But police admitted that they feared being accused of discrimination against Muslims, whether approaching women in tinderbox housing projects or on the Champs Elysee.
"The law will be very difficult to apply on certain estates," said Patrice Ribeiro, of the Synergie police union.
Referring to two Paris suburbs where riots regularly break out because of alleged discrimination against Muslims, Mr Ribeiro said: "I can’t see police going to book dozens of veiled women doing their shopping in Venissieux or in Trappes.
"It will be the same when a police officer is about to arrest a veiled Saudi who is about to go into Louis Vuitton on the Champs Elysees. In all cases, the forces of order will have to be measured and cautious in their behaviour."
Synergie has already instructed its members to view the ban as a "low priority", and Mr Ribeiro said there would "inevitably be incidents".
Mohamed Douhane, another Paris police officer and Synergie member, said he and his colleagues also "expected provocation by a minority."
Mr Douhane added: "Fundamentalist movements are eager to raise the stakes. The police know they will be held responsible for any public order disturbances."
Police have already been warned not to arrest women "in or around" mosques, and "citizen’s de-veilings" are also banned.
The strict instructions, from Interior Minister Claude Guent, are contained in a nine page circular issued to officers.
With tensions running high within the country’s six million strong Muslim community, officers have been told to look out for members of the public taking the law into their own hands.
Instead they will have to call the police, who will in turn have four hours to consider whether an offender should be fined.
This will apply to all garments which cover the eyes, although scarfs, hats, and sunglasses are excluded.
As well as a mosque, Muslims will also be able to put on a veil in the privacy of their own homes, a hotel room, or even a car, as long as they are not driving.
Police have already complained that they will have to waste time on "burka-chasing", with Denis Jacob, of the Alliance police union, adding: "We have more important matters to be dealing with."
The ban means France is officially the second country in Europe, after Belgium, to introduce a full ban on a garment which immigration minister Eric Besson has called a "walking coffin".
While French women face the fines and ‘civic duty’ guidance if they break the law, men who force their wives or daughters to wear burkas will face up to a year in prison, and fines of up to 25,000 pounds.
Posters have already gone up in town halls across France reading: "The Republic lives with its face uncovered."
Belgium introduced a full ban last year, although it has not been enforced with any vigour. A ban also looks likely in Holland, Spain and Switzerland.
There are no plans to introduce a similar ban in Britain, although politicians from the UK Independence Party and some Tory backbenchers have suggested one.
Calling 100 in Gzb may bring Delhi cops to you
NEW DELHI: While the National Capital Region (NCR) of Delhi shares the same Police Control Room (PCR) number, 100, calling the cops has become a herculean task for those living in the NCR region as the control room has no clarity to which state's police - Delhi or Uttar Pradesh - should the call be transferred.
The problem became glaring when this reporter on Sunday tried calling '100' to report against a driver who created a ruckus in front of the Pacific Mall, situated in Ghaziabad right across Anand Vihar Bus Terminal. As the reporter called up 100 to complaint against the driver, who was still at the spot and was being verbally abusive, the PCR could not understand the location of the incident. After calling the PCR twice and explaining that the driver was still at "Pacific Mall in Kaushambi, Ghaziabad", no help came for at least 30 minutes. By that time, the driver had fled. Finally, a cop from Pitampura police station, north Delhi, called up after half an hour only to inform that the PCR had transferred the complaint to their police station.
When told that the complaint was made in Ghaziabad, the cop said there was another mall by the same name in Pitampura and hence the call was transferred there. This is one of many instances where police have goofed up in transferring the call to the right location. Not only have the residents of Ghaziabad and Noida faced such a problem, but those living in Delhi-Gurgaon border areas have also faced similar situations.
When contacted, joint commissioner (operations) Deepak Mishra, Delhi Police, said he was aware of the problem. "We know that calls made from Ghaziabad near the UP border and from SIMs procured from Delhi, get diverted to Delhi PCR. We are investigating this particular case. The Ghaziabad police had forwarded the call to us, which led to the confusion. Ideally, Delhi Police should have immediately alerted the caller that they were forwarding the call to Ghaziabad police and even provided the Ghaziabad control room number,'' said Mishra.
The Ghaziabad police said they are in touch with several cellular operators to solve the problem. "The engineers have told us that there are several technical hitches in getting the problem solved. For now, we have started putting up our other control room numbers at vantage points. There are too many towers in the border area which is adding to the confusion,'' said a senior officer at the SSP (Ghaziabad) office.
"With no clarity on which call should be transferred to which state police, a more-efficient system is required to tackle the problem. The service providers of UP are yet to sort out whether the calls - especially from the border areas - have originated from their own area. As a result, there's always confusion between Delhi Police and UP Police and the victims suffer,'' said Shrestha Pandit, who has faced a similar situation on more than one occasion. She resides at sector 15A in Noida close to Delhi border. Interstate co-ordination meetings are on to sort out the problem, claimed UP police.
Police close to cracking Delhi ‘parcel’ body case
New Delhi: Delhi Police on Monday inched closer to solving the mystery related to a decomposed body of a young girl, which was parceled to Ajmer recently, after a family hailing from Jalandhar claimed that it could be their missing daughter.
According to reports, two members from a Jalandhar-based family approached the Lahori Gate Police Station after they came to know through media reports about an unclaimed body of a young girl found by the Rajasthan police.
The family told Delhi Police officials that their daughter is missing since March 13 and also gave her photographs to them for verification. After matching the photographs with that of the victim’s, Delhi Police has claimed of a striking similarity between the two.
In view of the development, the family is now being taken to Kishangarh in Ajmer district, where the victim's body has been kept in a freezer at the Yagya Narayan hospital.
The matter came to light on April 08, when the workers of a cargo company complained of foul smell coming out of a tin container under which the girl’s body was hidden.
After initial investigation, it was found that the parcel was sent from Old Delhi to Ajmer in Rajasthan on March 31.
Police suspects that woman was brutally tortured and murdered as there were burn injuries and stab wounds on her body.
Although, the efforts are on to nab the killer, the investigation so far has revealed that the body was parceled by Milap Transport Roadlines from the Lahori Gate area in north Delhi to its branch in Kishangarh in Ajmer.
Police claims that the suspected sender of the sender, who could possibly be the killer, has been identified as 'B' and the receiver was mentioned as 'self' in the transport slip.
The dispatch date mentioned in the slip was March 31, so the body could be at least one to two week old.
Meanwhile, a team of Rajasthan Police is also in Delhi to investigate the matter.
Police has also blamed the transport company for its sheer negligence in not properly verifying the names of the sender and the receiver of the parcel in the transportation slip.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)